Why don't the men complaining about gold diggers try dating professional women? - dates flashing other men
It is true that some women with one man, his wallet and the state, but it is also true in most men, the women try by flashing their money and talking about his own importance to win.
If people have a problem with women in terms of age, have sought to "marry up", then why are current state?
There are many women out there with a good race. Most of the nurses than the national average wage. Teachers make a note right. Many hairdressers are successful entrepreneurs. All these occupations are dominated by women.
In the younger generation, are more female than male graduates, and in Australia in the age group 18-29 women actually earn slightly more than their male counterparts.
So guys, what's the problem? Perhaps if you do not want a gold-digger, you should stop from the line of well-being and try your luck with women who earn a good career and a decent income.
What's so difficult?
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Dates Flashing Other Men Why Don't The Men Complaining About Gold Diggers Try Dating Professional Women?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
I do not know how many people in this complaint that want to housewives, and then complain that women are dependent on them for money. Make your mind can not spread in both directions.
Edit: the following drivers shows me why people do not want other women to be equal because they are afraid that nohing have more to offer than just money. What is a good way to see horrible things and if I were a man, a woman who loves me for me, not for what they prefer to offer.
This must be checked. The partner who makes the most money, is what happens to the final decisions. Men want to marry the miners to be desperate, the final decision maker at home. Having control is a key factor in their self-esteem.
FYI, I saw this in the gay and lesbian too. It is the same for all couples in which is a much better than others. The rich are shown in the control and not on this issue.
The risk is always there, even if they earn more than average, albeit a smaller risk. Now, the real solution to this problem is a lot more time asking tough questions, and without going through the same account dumbstick and as a sign of failure.
Why not always the women who can not see say, a good man trying to date a person skilled in
Why do some women are still men who abuse them then I think that all men are equal encounter
As always the fault of the woman. They do not understand that are so shallow and flat Launchers gold.
There are some gold diggers hot.
To see Twilight. It is true that what you reap sow. If you are for equality, you will not often played wrong
You do not want a challenge, lol.
Cheers :-)
What counts as a gold digger?
If a person lives with a wealthy person just for the money, it's a gold digger. It is wrong because it is a lie. What happens if a person lives with a grown rich and poor, and the other person becomes rich. Panning for gold is too? I think if two people are happy, no matter who has the money.
I went with a man who loved me before. He was not rich, but I was very bad at that time. I bought things, but that does not mean that this is the reason for that is with him. It was always there for me. I was very excited that her family accepted me as well. I am not poor, but remember who took care of me when I really needed.
Money is money. If you could help someone you love, do not see a problem, whether men or women.
Your idea does not seem to be valid, but the money is less likely to find someone really interested in the person. What would you think you can do a better chance if.
Personally I want a woman like me, equality thats my challenge me, comforts me, makes me laugh, inspired me. If I could, I would like to clone a female version of myself. Do I have any better or worse than the person, the person best suited for me than this, I feel alive and young people at this person. etc.
What makes you think "working women" may also Golddigger? Do you understand me guys, is wrong to claim the gold rush is annoying but not a good argument.
for most men, the women have great material wealth Neede not only their right to almost everything except the obvious.
Let me be honest. I went with both. Women who have and have-nots. Both are interesting, but the woman who wants control and will never be approved for my fragile ego. I really need, including the need to know that I am important and I am contributing to their happiness, and yes, I also need security.
if it is then to everything they offer, you can fight for your business at any time to feel their movements. There is no security there.
In fact, both sexes want the same thing. We know that you wanted, and for a different meaning.
I only use my head and avoid the gold diggers do not care, here. Professional women are less likely to be gold diggers? Perhaps, but that does not mean non-existent. Personally, I know women who have solid career, but still worry about the size of the portfolio of people and how they are rich.
"" Yes, earn in Australia in the age group 18-29 women actually little more than their male counterparts. ""
Whoa! Most of the gap move, "while the payment" crap out the window, is not it?
Post a Comment